[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101015025047.GA9640@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 04:50:47 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, John Reiser <jreiser@...wagon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ftrace/x86: Add support for C version of recordmcount
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
>
> This patch adds the support for the C version of recordmcount and
> compile times show ~ 12% improvement.
I reported this recordmcount performance problem 2 years ago. Better
later than never i guess.
> +ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
> + ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_C_MCOUNT_RECORD
> + BUILD_C_RECORDMCOUNT := y
> + export BUILD_C_RECORDMCOUNT
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ config X86
> select HAVE_KRETPROBES
> select HAVE_OPTPROBES
> select HAVE_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD
> + select HAVE_C_MCOUNT_RECORD
The naming is inconsistent here - it should be HAVE_C_RECORDMCOUNT, like
the build variable has, and like the utility is called. If we are going
to add this flag to most architectures we should name it consistently.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists