[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1010150922440.22598@router.home>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:23:33 -0500 (CDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Michael Chan <mchan@...adcom.com>,
Eilon Greenstein <eilong@...adcom.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: allocate skbs on local node
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Oct 2010, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>
> > > I was going to mention that as an idea, but I thought storing the metadata
> > > for certain debugging features might differ from the two allocators so
> > > substantially that it would be even more convoluted and difficult to
> > > maintain?
> >
> > We could have some callbacks to store allocator specific metadata?
> >
>
> It depends on whether we could share the same base for both slab (unified
> allocator) and slub, which you snipped from your reply, that would make
> this cleaner.
I already said before that we should consider having a common base so I
thought that was not necessary.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists