[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1287153511.29097.1522.camel@twins>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 16:38:31 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] x86: Add IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING in x86 -v4
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 17:03 -0700, Venkatesh Pallipadi wrote:
> @@ -801,6 +805,7 @@ void mark_tsc_unstable(char *reason)
> if (!tsc_unstable) {
> tsc_unstable = 1;
> sched_clock_stable = 0;
> + disable_sched_clock_irqtime();
> printk(KERN_INFO "Marking TSC unstable due to %s\n", reason);
> /* Change only the rating, when not registered */
> if (clocksource_tsc.mult)
I think we can be less strict that this and keep it enabled for
everything with constant tsc and nonstop tsc.
Since we're using it strictly per-cpu the cross-cpu sync isn't really
important, all we need it to know the per-cpu value doesn't go all
screwy on us.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists