[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=juk+824k1R8mJrDostKhRz+nRNqj9E-rNYWrv@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 19:27:39 +0300
From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>
To: "Guzman Lugo, Fernando" <fernando.lugo@...com>
Cc: "gregkh@...e.de" <gregkh@...e.de>,
"felipe.contreras@...ia.com" <felipe.contreras@...ia.com>,
"ameya.palande@...ia.com" <ameya.palande@...ia.com>,
"Menon, Nishanth" <nm@...com>,
"Hiroshi.DOYU@...ia.com" <Hiroshi.DOYU@...ia.com>,
"ohad@...ery.com" <ohad@...ery.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"andy.shevchenko@...il.com" <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 00/11] staging tidspbridge: iommu migration
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Guzman Lugo, Fernando
<fernando.lugo@...com> wrote:
>> Well, in my experience it's the other way around, the stress
>> test-cases don't catch the errors that happen on real
>> use-case scenarios, no matter how extensive they are. This is
>> a good example.
>
> I am facing some unstability with the latest bridge merge. I am looing into
> That once it is stable I wil check you testcase too to confirm everything is
> Working fine.
If you want I can provide my working branch on top of .36-rc8 with
next-staging merged. If I revert your patches, it works fine.
--
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists