linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf_events: fix transaction recovery in group_sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1287164387.1998.109.camel@laptop>
Date:	Fri, 15 Oct 2010 19:39:47 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, paulus@...ba.org,
	davem@...emloft.net, fweisbec@...il.com,
	perfmon2-devel@...ts.sf.net, eranian@...il.com,
	robert.richter@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf_events: fix transaction recovery in
 group_sched_in()

On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 19:34 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> 
> > Yes, makes sense.. I'm a bit hesitant to slap a -stable tag on it due to
> > its size,.. Ingo, Paulus?
> >
> I was worried about the size too but I could not figure out another
> smaller way of doing this. An alternative would be to pass an
> extra argument to the function and call it twice. 

I think the current approach is fine, just being paranoid about
unintentional breakage..

I guess we should cook it a while before offering it to -stable.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/