[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CB8A944.8090904@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:19:32 -0700
From: Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: Louis Rilling <louis.rilling@...labs.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Matthieu Fertré <matthieu.fertre@...labs.com>,
Darren Hart <darren@...art.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] futex: fix key reference counter in case of requeue.
On 10/15/2010 05:16 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Oct 2010, Louis Rilling wrote:
...
>> Once process P is woken up, it should unqueue, drop reference to 'key2'
>> (the one referring to the futex_q, this is done in unqueue_me())
>> and to 'key1' (the one referring to futex_wait operation). Without this
>> patch it drops reference to 'key2' instead of 'key1'.
>
> I can see the bug, but while the patch fixes it I don't think it is
> the proper solution. Aside of that we might have a similar problem in
> the futex_wait_requeue_pi() code.
We do, and it's a bit more tangled. No surprises there.
> The real underlying problem is, that futex_wait_setup() returns with
> two references held in the case of success. That's what needs to be
> fixed in the first place.
>
> The futex_wait() case can be fixed with the patch below, still looking
> into the futex_wait_requeue_pi() maze.
>
> Darren, this whole key refcounting needs to be simplified _AND_
> documented.
Agreed. We'll get this and futex_wait_requeue_pi fixed now, and then
I'll spend some time cleaning this mess up after LPC.
I'll test the following along with a wait_requeue_pi fix and report back.
--
Darren
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
> ---
> Index: linux-2.6-tip/kernel/futex.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-tip.orig/kernel/futex.c
> +++ linux-2.6-tip/kernel/futex.c
> @@ -1786,8 +1786,14 @@ retry_private:
> }
>
> out:
> - if (ret)
> - put_futex_key(fshared,&q->key);
> + /*
> + * On success we hold here two references acquired in
> + * get_futex_key() and queue_lock(). Drop one.
> + *
> + * On failure we hold one reference acquired in
> + * get_futex_key(). Drop it.
> + */
> + put_futex_key(fshared,&q->key);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -1819,7 +1825,7 @@ static int futex_wait(u32 __user *uaddr,
> }
>
> retry:
> - /* Prepare to wait on uaddr. */
> + /* Prepare to wait on uaddr. Hold hb lock and q.key ref on success */
> ret = futex_wait_setup(uaddr, val, fshared,&q,&hb);
> if (ret)
> goto out;
> @@ -1829,24 +1835,23 @@ retry:
>
> /* If we were woken (and unqueued), we succeeded, whatever. */
> ret = 0;
> + /* unqueue_me() drops q.key ref */
> if (!unqueue_me(&q))
> - goto out_put_key;
> + goto out;
> ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> if (to&& !to->task)
> - goto out_put_key;
> + goto out;
>
> /*
> * We expect signal_pending(current), but we might be the
> * victim of a spurious wakeup as well.
> */
> - if (!signal_pending(current)) {
> - put_futex_key(fshared,&q.key);
> + if (!signal_pending(current))
> goto retry;
> - }
>
> ret = -ERESTARTSYS;
> if (!abs_time)
> - goto out_put_key;
> + goto out;
>
> restart =¤t_thread_info()->restart_block;
> restart->fn = futex_wait_restart;
> @@ -1863,8 +1868,6 @@ retry:
>
> ret = -ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK;
>
> -out_put_key:
> - put_futex_key(fshared,&q.key);
> out:
> if (to) {
> hrtimer_cancel(&to->timer);
--
Darren Hart
Embedded Linux Kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists