linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/17] fs: icache lock inode hash

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 16 Oct 2010 18:57:43 +1100
From:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/17] fs: icache lock inode hash

On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 02:06:50AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:18:35PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
> > 
> > Currently the inode hash lists are protected by the inode_lock. To
> > allow removal of the inode_lock, we need to protect the inode hash
> > table lists with a new lock. Nest the new inode_hash_lock inside the
> > inode_lock to protect the hash lists.
> 
> There is no reason to make inode_hash_lock global, it's only used inside
> inode.c

It was like that while hugetlbfs still used it. Fixed, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/