linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/19] fs: Convert nr_inodes and nr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1287250008.1998.123.camel@laptop>
Date:	Sat, 16 Oct 2010 19:26:48 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/19] fs: Convert nr_inodes and nr_unused to per-cpu
 counters

On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 12:27 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> 
> In cases you mention, you want a precise count (aka
> percpu_counter_sum_positive()), not the approximate one (aka
> percpu_counter_read_positive()).
> 
> The only difference is then the possible/online cpu loop difference.
> 
In either case, SGI is screwed, doing millions of for_each_*_cpu() loops
per second isn't going to work for them.

fwiw, for_each_*_cpu() takes longer than a single jiffy tick on those
machines.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/