linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] arch generic way to trigger unknown NMIs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1010170055260.15889@eddie.linux-mips.org>
Date:	Sun, 17 Oct 2010 00:59:11 +0100 (BST)
From:	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>
To:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
cc:	Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	mingo@...e.hu, fweisbec@...il.com, robert.richter@....com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] arch generic way to trigger unknown NMIs

On Sat, 16 Oct 2010, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:

> > >  Hi Maciej, the send_IPI_self could be modified to send NMI (at moment it
> > > uses self shortcut with fixed delivery mode). The question is rather if
> > > we need it without a real caller yet. When Don's patch gets merged we
> > > will have a real caller then and could update send_IPI_self to support
> > > NMI delivery mode. Something like that :)
> > 
> >  Sounds backwards to me.  My understanding is a need has just arisen, so 
> > why not:
> > 
> > 1. Update send_IPI_self().
> > 
> > 2. Add code that makes use of the new functionality.
> > 
> > 3. Submit all the changes as self-contained patches in a single series to 
> >    be applied at the same time.
> > 
> > ?  That's what I'd imagine the most natural way of doing this would be.
> 
>  Well, Maciej I believe the problem is not in modifying send_IPI_self
> but rather _how_ to make it more natural and do not introduce overhead.
> apic code is already weird enough :) Need to think.
> 
> (
>  btw, we will have to add additional flag which would check for NMI
>  being generated by "NMI-tester" and make a second apic write to
>  ICR to deassert level line, ie it could be something like
> 
>   apic->send_IPI_self(NMI_VECTOR)       ; with asserts level
>    default_do_nmi()                     ; check for NMI being sent for testing purpose
>      apic->send_IPI_self(NMI_VECTOR)    ; with deasserts level
> 
>  iirc apic itself doesn't deassert nmi line on message with
>  nmi deliver mode arrival
>  )

 How different is it to the other two send_IPI shorthand calls?  Or the 
fully-fledged one?  I gather from this thread they already handle NMIs 
properly, so what is there within that cannot simply be copied over to 
this one?

  Maciej
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/