[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201010171859.44942.ffainelli@freebox.fr>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 18:59:43 +0200
From: Florian Fainelli <ffainelli@...ebox.fr>
To: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, mbizon@...ebox.fr,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] MIPS: Decouple BMIPS CPU support from bcm47xx/bcm63xx SoC code
Hello Kevin,
Le Saturday 16 October 2010 23:22:30, Kevin Cernekee a écrit :
> BMIPS processor cores are used in 50+ different chipsets spread across
> 5+ product lines. In many cases the chipsets do not share the same
> peripheral register layouts, the same register blocks, the same
> interrupt controllers, the same memory maps, or much of anything else.
>
> But, across radically different SoCs that share nothing more than the
> same BMIPS CPU, a few things are still mostly constant:
>
> SMP operations
> Access to performance counters
> DMA cache coherency quirks
> Cache and memory bus configuration
>
> So, it makes sense to treat each BMIPS processor type as a generic
> "building block," rather than tying it to a specific SoC. This makes it
> easier to support a large number of BMIPS-based chipsets without
> unnecessary duplication of code, and provides the infrastructure needed
> to support BMIPS-proprietary features.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>
I boot tested all of your nine patches on a BCM6348 system without problems.
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <ffainelli@...ebox.fr>
--
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists