[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101017003526.GA29677@dastard>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 11:35:26 +1100
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ibm.com>,
warthog9@...nel.org, devel@...ts.fedoraprojet.org
Subject: Re: ima: use of radix tree cache indexing == massive waste of
memory?
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 02:10:29PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> >Besides the algorithmic problems with ima, why is kernel.org using
> >IMA to start with? Except for IBM looking for a reason to jusity why
> >TPM isn't a completely waster of ressources it's pointless. And it was
> >only merged under the premise that it would not affect innocent normal
> >users.
>
> I'm confused ... what makes you think we are? This might have
> been an unintentional misconfiguration...
It's enabled in the kernel that is running:
$ grep CONFIG_IMA /boot/config-2.6.34.7-56.fc11.x86_64
CONFIG_IMA=y
CONFIG_IMA_MEASURE_PCR_IDX=10
CONFIG_IMA_AUDIT=y
CONFIG_IMA_LSM_RULES=y
$
and it's using lots of memory, so if you're not actually using it I
think it should be disabled.
If this is a stock fedora config, then they've got some work to
do....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists