linux-kernel - Re: oom_killer crash linux system

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:13:51 +0800
From:	"Figo.zhang" <zhangtianfei@...dcoretech.com>
To:	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"rientjes@...gle.com" <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	figo1802 <figo1802@...il.com>
Subject: Re: oom_killer crash linux system


i want to test the oom-killer. My desktop (Dell optiplex 780, i686
kernel)have 2GB ram, i turn off the swap partition, and open a huge pdf
files and applications, and let the system eat huge ram.

in 2.6.35, i can use ram up to 1.75GB,

but in 2.6.36-rc8, i just use to 1.53GB ram , the system come very slow
and crashed after some minutes , the DiskIO is very busy. i see the
DiskIO read is up to 8MB/s, write just only 400KB/s, (see by conky).

what change between 2.6.35 to 2.6.36-rc8? is it low performance about
page reclaim and page writeback in high press ram useage?

Best,
Figo.zhang




On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 10:11 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 09:57:22AM +0800, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:47:39 +0800
> > "Figo.zhang" <zhangtianfei@...dcoretech.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > hi all,
> > > 
> > > i have a desktop run linux2.6.35 and have 2GB ram. i turn off the swap
> > > partition, and i open huge applications , let the system eat more and
> > > more memory.
> > > when the system eat more than 1.7G ram, the system crashed.
> > > 
> > 
> > 2.6.36-rc series has a completely new logic, please try.
> 
> And the new logic should help this case.
> 
> commit a63d83f427fbce97a6cea0db2e64b0eb8435cd10
> Author: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
> Date:   Mon Aug 9 17:19:46 2010 -0700
> 
>     oom: badness heuristic rewrite
> ...
>     Instead of basing the heuristic on mm->total_vm for each task, the task's
>     rss and swap space is used instead.  This is a better indication of the
>     amount of memory that will be freeable if the oom killed task is chosen
>     and subsequently exits.  This helps specifically in cases where KDE or
>     GNOME is chosen for oom kill on desktop systems instead of a memory
>     hogging task.
> ...
> 
> Thanks,
> Fengguang


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/