[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1287390287.29097.1539.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:24:47 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:perf/core] x86, NMI: Rewrite NMI handler
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 11:06 +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> You can kill DIE_NMI_IPI. But you will add at least NMI_PRIORITY_LOCAL
> (like DIE_NMI_IPI), NMI_PRIORITY_GLOBAL (like original DIE_NMI). So
> thing is similar, just moved from one place to another place.
The nice thing is that notifier chains aren't limited to 2 priorities,
in fact there's a good argument to use a wider range.
Also, like previously mentioned, it gets rid of the double iteration.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists