[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1287393327.29097.1542.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:15:27 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] Call tick_check_idle before __irq_enter
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 17:05 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 05:03:23PM -0700, Venkatesh Pallipadi wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
> > index 267f7b7..6bb7e19 100644
> > --- a/kernel/softirq.c
> > +++ b/kernel/softirq.c
> > @@ -296,10 +296,16 @@ void irq_enter(void)
> >
> > rcu_irq_enter();
> > if (idle_cpu(cpu) && !in_interrupt()) {
> > - __irq_enter();
> > + /*
> > + * Prevent raise_softirq from needlessly waking up ksoftirqd
> > + * here, as softirq will be serviced on return from interrupt.
> > + */
> > + local_bh_disable();
> > tick_check_idle(cpu);
> > - } else
> > - __irq_enter();
> > + local_bh_enable();
>
> _local_bh_enable()
>
> local_bh_enable() could invoke do_softirq().
This seems to indeed cure that explosion.. Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists