[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101018150737.GI12449@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:07:37 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/22] arm: introduce little endian bitops
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 04:45:12PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Note that patches 20 and 22 of the series completely eliminate the
> the minix and ext2 definitions, putting them into architecture independent
> code in those two file systems where they belong.
Good.
> Adding the new definitions in patch 4 is just a logical step before removing
> the old definitions in the later patches while maintaining bisectability.
In which case I don't have a problem with the series.
> > What I'm trying to say is please don't make the existing mess of bitops
> > any worse than it currently is.
>
> The series currently adds 20 lines to the arm code (could be reduced to
> 6 lines), but removes 26 lines which are essentially architecture
> independent and shouldn't be there to start with. I'd call that the
> opposite of making the mess worse.
Right - if I could've seen the rest of the series, then maybe I'd have
known that. However, I seemed to have silently dropped off linux-arch
back in April and only just noticed, which means I've missed rather a
lot...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists