[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101018114039.503233da.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:40:39 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jdike@...toit.com,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, toralf.foerster@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] hostfs: fix UML crash
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:36:54 +0200 Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:
> 365b1818 resized f_spare within struct statfs.
> hostfs accesses f_spare directly and needs an update.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
> Reported-by: Toralf F__rster <toralf.foerster@....de>
> Tested-by: Toralf F__rster <toralf.foerster@....de>
> ---
> fs/hostfs/hostfs_user.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/hostfs/hostfs_user.c b/fs/hostfs/hostfs_user.c
> index 6777aa0..ce2f168 100644
> --- a/fs/hostfs/hostfs_user.c
> +++ b/fs/hostfs/hostfs_user.c
> @@ -388,6 +388,6 @@ int do_statfs(char *root, long *bsize_out, long long *blocks_out,
> spare_out[1] = buf.f_spare[1];
> spare_out[2] = buf.f_spare[2];
> spare_out[3] = buf.f_spare[3];
> - spare_out[4] = buf.f_spare[4];
> +
> return 0;
> }
Thanks.
Is there any reason for hostfs to be playing with the f_spare field at all?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists