[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1010182243580.6815@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:44:37 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Richard Cochran <richard.cochran@...cron.at>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] [RFC] posix clocks: dynamic clock ids.
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 05:38:50PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> > From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
> >
> > This patch augments the POSIX clock code to offer a dynamic clock
> > creation method. Instead of registering a hard coded clock ID, modules
> > may call create_posix_clock(), which returns a new clock ID.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Richard Cochran <richard.cochran@...cron.at>
> >
> > This patch still has un-addressed lifetime issues pointed out by
> > Alan Cox. More work is needed here, but for now this provides the
> > functionality needed for the following patches.
>
> I am working on a fully dynamic clock implementation in the style
> suggested by Alan. Using it would change some details in this RTC
> patch series, but not the general idea.
>
> Should I post the dynamic clock stuff all by itself for review?
Incremental is preferred. We all know by now what it's going to be
used for.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists