linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86, irq: Check if irq is remapped before freeing irte

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 18 Oct 2010 23:09:23 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, irq: Check if irq is remapped before freeing irte

On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/pci/intr_remapping.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/pci/intr_remapping.c
> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/pci/intr_remapping.c
> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ int get_irte(int irq, struct irte *entry
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	int index;
>  
> -	if (!entry || !irq_iommu)
> +	if (!entry || !irq_iommu || !irq_iommu->iommu)
>  		return -1;

Hmm, why do we need this? This is only called from
ir_ioapic_set_affinity() and ir_msi_set_affinity().

We should never end up there when intr_remapping=off, right ?
  
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&irq_2_ir_lock, flags);
> @@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ int free_irte(int irq)
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	int rc;
>  
> -	if (!irq_iommu)
> +	if (!irq_iommu || !irq_iommu->iommu)
>  		return -1;

That one makes sense

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/