[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1287437758.5588.59.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:35:58 -0700
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@...onical.com>,
Jeff Ohlstein <johlstei@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the msm tree with the arm tree
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 17:17 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, Daniel Walker wrote:
>
> > I guess your assuming I send my pull request after Russell's, which
> > isn't necessarily true, and I'd rather not have that dependency if I
> > don't have to.
>
> Look, we're not establishing a straight rule here -- just figuring out a
> way to move forward. What we're asking you to do is either ask RMK to
> pull your tree now, or wait until RMK's tree has hit mainline so you can
> pull Linus' tree and fix the issue yourself before asking Linus to pull,
> or whatever. Is some collaboration on your part for this particular
> issue too much to ask for?
I'm always very cooperative, if you read back in the thread I basically
suggested I would be sending a pull request to Russell. That was prior
to Arnd'd comments.
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists