linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86, irq: Check if irq is remapped before freeing irte

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4CBCC8B3.7030706@kernel.org>
Date:	Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:22:43 -0700
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, irq: Check if irq is remapped before freeing irte

On 10/18/2010 02:17 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> 
> 
> On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>
>>> Index: linux-2.6/drivers/pci/intr_remapping.c
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/pci/intr_remapping.c
>>> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/pci/intr_remapping.c
>>> @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ int get_irte(int irq, struct irte *entry
>>>  	unsigned long flags;
>>>  	int index;
>>>  
>>> -	if (!entry || !irq_iommu)
>>> +	if (!entry || !irq_iommu || !irq_iommu->iommu)
>>>  		return -1;
>>
>> Hmm, why do we need this? This is only called from
>> ir_ioapic_set_affinity() and ir_msi_set_affinity().
>>
>> We should never end up there when intr_remapping=off, right ?
> 
> Thinking more about it, this check is actively bogus. The call sites do:
> 
>         struct irte irte;
> 
>         if (get_irte(irq, &irte))
>                 return -1;
> 
> So entry _CANNOT_ be NULL.
> 
> And in fact we should change get_irte() to
> 
> get_irte(struct irq_2_iommu *irq_iommu, struct irte *entry)
> 
> The call site already knows about it. No need to lookup irq_iommu
> based on the irq number.

looks like all irq-irte related API could replace "int irq" to "struct irq_2_iommu *irq_iommu"

extern int get_irte(int irq, struct irte *entry);
extern int modify_irte(int irq, struct irte *irte_modified);
extern int alloc_irte(struct intel_iommu *iommu, int irq, u16 count);
extern int set_irte_irq(int irq, struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 index,
                        u16 sub_handle);
extern int map_irq_to_irte_handle(int irq, u16 *sub_handle);
extern int free_irte(int irq);

Thanks

Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/