linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH V2 -tip] lib,x86_64: improve the performance of memcpy() for unaligned copy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <C10D3FB0CD45994C8A51FEC1227CE22F15D77721FD@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:27:40 +0800
From:	"Ma, Ling" <ling.ma@...el.com>
To:	"miaox@...fujitsu.com" <miaox@...fujitsu.com>
CC:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"Zhao, Yakui" <yakui.zhao@...el.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 -tip] lib,x86_64: improve the performance of memcpy()
 for unaligned copy

Could please send out cpu info for this cpu model.

Thanks
Ling

-----Original Message-----
From: Miao Xie [mailto:miaox@...fujitsu.com] 
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 2:24 PM
To: Ma, Ling
Cc: H. Peter Anvin; Ingo Molnar; Andi Kleen; Thomas Gleixner; Zhao, Yakui; Linux Kernel
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 -tip] lib,x86_64: improve the performance of memcpy() for unaligned copy

On Fri, 15 Oct 2010 03:43:53 +0800, Ma, Ling wrote:
> Attachment includes memcpy-kernel.c(cc -O2 memcpy-kernel.c -o 
> memcpy-kernel), and unaligned test cases on Atom.

I have tested on my Core2 Duo machine with your benchmark tool. Attachment is the test result. But the result is different with yours on Atom, It seems the performance is better with this patch.

According to these two different result, maybe we need optimize memcpy() by CPU model.

Thanks
Miao

>
> Thanks
> Ling
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ma, Ling
> Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 9:14 AM
> To: 'H. Peter Anvin'; miaox@...fujitsu.com
> Cc: Ingo Molnar; Andi Kleen; Thomas Gleixner; Zhao, Yakui; Linux 
> Kernel
> Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 -tip] lib,x86_64: improve the performance of 
> memcpy() for unaligned copy
>
> Sure, I will post benchmark tool and benchmark on Atom 64bit soon.
>
> Thanks
> Ling
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: H. Peter Anvin [mailto:hpa@...or.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 5:32 AM
> To: miaox@...fujitsu.com
> Cc: Ma, Ling; Ingo Molnar; Andi Kleen; Thomas Gleixner; Zhao, Yakui; 
> Linux Kernel
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 -tip] lib,x86_64: improve the performance of 
> memcpy() for unaligned copy
>
> On 10/08/2010 02:02 AM, Miao Xie wrote:
>> On Fri, 8 Oct 2010 15:42:45 +0800, Ma, Ling wrote:
>>> Could you please give us full address for each comparison result,we will do some tests on my machine.
>>> For unaligned cases older cpus will crossing cache line and slow down caused by load and store, but for nhm, no necessary to care about it.
>>> By the way in kernel 64bit mode, our access mode should be around 8byte aligned.
>>
>> Would you need my benchmark tool? I think it is helpful for your test.
>>
>
> If you could post the benchmark tool that would be great.
>
> 	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/