linux-kernel - linux-next: build failure after merge of the security-testing tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 19 Oct 2010 14:57:47 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>, Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the security-testing tree

Hi James,

After merging the security-testing tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc_ppc64_defconfig)
failed like this:

net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c: In function 'ctnetlink_conntrack_event':
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c:585: error: 'struct nf_conn' has no member named 'secmark'

Caused by commit fd0194de4cf2e64514aec35f40de458fca766656 ("conntrack:
export lsm context rather than internal secid via netlink").  This build
has CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_SECMARK not set ...

If you change a dependency on a CONFIG option, it is always worth build
testing with and without the option set.

I have used the security-testing tree from next-20101018 for today.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped