[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101019145747.f828be03.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 14:57:47 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>, Paul Moore <paul.moore@...com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the security-testing tree
Hi James,
After merging the security-testing tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc_ppc64_defconfig)
failed like this:
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c: In function 'ctnetlink_conntrack_event':
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c:585: error: 'struct nf_conn' has no member named 'secmark'
Caused by commit fd0194de4cf2e64514aec35f40de458fca766656 ("conntrack:
export lsm context rather than internal secid via netlink"). This build
has CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_SECMARK not set ...
If you change a dependency on a CONFIG option, it is always worth build
testing with and without the option set.
I have used the security-testing tree from next-20101018 for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists