[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101019134345.A1E9.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 13:49:12 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: npiggin@...nel.dk
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [patch 03/35] mm: implement per-zone shrinker
Hi
> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/mm.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/mm.h 2010-10-19 14:19:40.000000000 +1100
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/mm.h 2010-10-19 14:36:48.000000000 +1100
> @@ -997,6 +997,10 @@
> /*
> * A callback you can register to apply pressure to ageable caches.
> *
> + * 'shrink_zone' is the new shrinker API. It is to be used in preference
> + * to 'shrink'. One must point to a shrinker function, the other must
> + * be NULL. See 'shrink_slab' for details about the shrink_zone API.
> + *
> * 'shrink' is passed a count 'nr_to_scan' and a 'gfpmask'. It should
> * look through the least-recently-used 'nr_to_scan' entries and
> * attempt to free them up. It should return the number of objects
> @@ -1013,13 +1017,53 @@
> int (*shrink)(struct shrinker *, int nr_to_scan, gfp_t gfp_mask);
> int seeks; /* seeks to recreate an obj */
>
> + /*
> + * shrink_zone - slab shrinker callback for reclaimable objects
> + * @shrink: this struct shrinker
> + * @zone: zone to scan
> + * @scanned: pagecache lru pages scanned in zone
> + * @total: total pagecache lru pages in zone
> + * @global: global pagecache lru pages (for zone-unaware shrinkers)
> + * @flags: shrinker flags
> + * @gfp_mask: gfp context we are operating within
> + *
> + * The shrinkers are responsible for calculating the appropriate
> + * pressure to apply, batching up scanning (and cond_resched,
> + * cond_resched_lock etc), and updating events counters including
> + * count_vm_event(SLABS_SCANNED, nr).
> + *
> + * This approach gives flexibility to the shrinkers. They know best how
> + * to do batching, how much time between cond_resched is appropriate,
> + * what statistics to increment, etc.
> + */
> + void (*shrink_zone)(struct shrinker *shrink,
> + struct zone *zone, unsigned long scanned,
> + unsigned long total, unsigned long global,
> + unsigned long flags, gfp_t gfp_mask);
Now we decided to don't remove old (*shrink)() interface and zone unaware
slab users continue to use it. so why do we need global argument?
If only zone aware shrinker user (*shrink_zone)(), we can remove it.
Personally I think we should remove it because a removing makes a clear
message that all shrinker need to implement zone awareness eventually.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists