lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 16:55:32 +0800 From: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@...el.com> Subject: Re: [patch]x86: spread tlb flush vector between nodes On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 16:44 +0800, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote: > > > Technically, it is way too late for anything new in this merge window, but we can > > try to make a reasonable assessment of the risk since the merge window got > > delayed. However, this close to the merge window you cannot just expect to be > > merged even if the patch itself is OK. > > a prompt re-send of the patch today-ish, with proper changelog, etc. and with the > new tuning in place is definitely a must. the previous patch has changelog. what did you mean a new tuning? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists