linux-kernel - Re: [patch]x86: spread tlb flush vector between nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1287478532.9456.0.camel@sli10-conroe.sh.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 19 Oct 2010 16:55:32 +0800
From:	Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [patch]x86: spread tlb flush vector between nodes

On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 16:44 +0800, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> 
> > Technically, it is way too late for anything new in this merge window, but we can 
> > try to make a reasonable assessment of the risk since the merge window got 
> > delayed.  However, this close to the merge window you cannot just expect to be 
> > merged even if the patch itself is OK.
> 
> a prompt re-send of the patch today-ish, with proper changelog, etc. and with the 
> new tuning in place is definitely a must.
the previous patch has changelog. what did you mean a new tuning?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/