[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1287493687.1994.10.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:08:07 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Koki Sanagi <sanagi.koki@...fujitsu.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, nhorman@...driver.com,
scott.a.mcmillan@...el.com, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com, kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Cleanup the convoluted softirq tracepoints
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 15:00 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> With the addition of trace_softirq_raise() the softirq tracepoint got
> even more convoluted. Why the tracepoints take two pointers to assign
> an integer is beyond my comprehension.
>
> But adding an extra case which treats the first pointer as an unsigned
> long when the second pointer is NULL including the back and forth
> type casting is just horrible.
>
> Convert the softirq tracepoints to take a single unsigned int argument
> for the softirq vector number and fix the call sites.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
A much needed cleanup indeed!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists