[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CBD9B7F.6040307@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:22:07 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andy Shevchenko <ext-andriy.shevchenko@...ia.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sysctl: remove sysctl syscall
On 10/19/2010 10:22 AM, Amerigo Wang wrote:
> Remove the obsolete sysctl syscall. It was scheduled
> to be removed in Sept.
I thought at least older glibc was still using it? Did anyone check
what happens if it sees no sysctl(2)?
I think it's ok to remove the full tables, but keeping
a wrapper just for the functionality glibc use(s/d) is still a good
idea.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists