[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201010191536.33373.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:36:33 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
ksummit-2010-discuss@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2010-discuss] [v2] Remaining BKL users, what to do
[trimming Cc list]
On Tuesday 19 October 2010, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> I think we also need to cover the PREEMPT case too. But that could be a
> compile time check, since you can't boot a preempt kernel and make it
> non preempt.
Right. Can we turn the lock_kernel() into preempt_disable() in these
drivers when we know we never run on SMP?
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists