[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101019101158.29e8cd0f@bike.lwn.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 10:11:58 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] support polling of /proc/swaps
> From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
> Subject: support polling of /proc/swaps
>
> System management wants to subscribe to changes in swap
> configuration. Make /proc/swaps pollable like /proc/mounts.
Please forgive me...I'm probably undercaffeinated and even dumber than
usual, but...
Here we have this:
> +static unsigned swaps_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
> +{
> + struct proc_swaps *s = file->private_data;
But here I see:
> static int swaps_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> {
> - return seq_open(file, &swaps_op);
> + struct proc_swaps *s;
> + int ret;
> +
> + s = kmalloc(sizeof(struct proc_swaps), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!s)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + file->private_data = &s->seq;
It sure looks to me like private_data is a struct seq_file pointer, not a
struct proc_swaps pointer. What am I missing?
Thanks,
jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists