lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101019101158.29e8cd0f@bike.lwn.net>
Date:	Tue, 19 Oct 2010 10:11:58 -0600
From:	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] support polling of /proc/swaps

> From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
> Subject: support polling of /proc/swaps
> 
> System management wants to subscribe to changes in swap
> configuration. Make /proc/swaps pollable like /proc/mounts.

Please forgive me...I'm probably undercaffeinated and even dumber than
usual, but...

Here we have this:

> +static unsigned swaps_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
> +{
> +	struct proc_swaps *s = file->private_data;

But here I see:

>  static int swaps_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>  {
> -	return seq_open(file, &swaps_op);
> +	struct proc_swaps *s;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	s = kmalloc(sizeof(struct proc_swaps), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!s)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	file->private_data = &s->seq;

It sure looks to me like private_data is a struct seq_file pointer, not a
struct proc_swaps pointer.  What am I missing?

Thanks,

jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ