[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101019181249.GA9789@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 19:12:49 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Colin Cross <ccross@...gle.com>
Cc: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
linux-main <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Arnd Hannemann <arnd@...dnet.de>,
Han Jonghun <jonghun79.han@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Hemant Pedanekar <hemantp@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: allow, but warn, when issuing ioremap() on RAM
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 01:13:36AM -0700, Colin Cross wrote:
> If memblock_remove is used on the end of memory with this patch,
> mem_init accesses off the end of the array of page structures because
> of the discrepancy between memblock.memory and membank on the number
> of the last pfn. memblock.memory is used to determine the memory
> zones in arm_bootmem_free, which eventually is used to create the
> array of page structures, but mem_init iterates over membank and calls
> pfn_to_page on pfns up to bank_pfn_end.
>
> Converting show_mem and mem_init to use memblock.memory fixes it:
I intentionally did not do this because it won't work. membank
information is purposely not coalesced together when you have full
sparsemem regions - which may result in
pfn_to_page(pfn) != pfn_to_page(pfn + 1) - 1
However, memblock information is coalesced, and so will cross these
boundaries. This means using memblock instead of membank will make
things go pop.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists