[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101020131857.cd0ecd38.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:18:57 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
containers@...ts.osdl.org, Andrea Righi <arighi@...eler.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Ciju Rajan K <ciju@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/11] memcg: check memcg dirty limits in page
writeback
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 10:00:15 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:39:44 -0700
> Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> > If the current process is in a non-root memcg, then
> > global_dirty_limits() will consider the memcg dirty limit.
> > This allows different cgroups to have distinct dirty limits
> > which trigger direct and background writeback at different
> > levels.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <arighi@...eler.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
>
Why FREEPAGES in memcg is not counted as dirtyable ?
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists