[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1287551880.2700.79.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 07:18:00 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2]percpu: introduce read mostly percpu API
Le mercredi 20 octobre 2010 à 11:07 +0800, Shaohua Li a écrit :
> Add a new readmostly percpu section and api, next patch will use it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
> ---
Could you precisely describe why grouping together read mostly percpu
variables is a win ? Especially when you add in your next patch a single
variable ?
> include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h | 4 ++++
> include/linux/percpu-defs.h | 9 +++++++++
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h 2010-10-20 09:32:52.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h 2010-10-20 10:03:38.000000000 +0800
> @@ -677,6 +677,8 @@
> - LOAD_OFFSET) { \
> VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__per_cpu_start) = .; \
> *(.data..percpu..first) \
> + . = ALIGN(PAGE_SIZE); \
> + *(.data..percpu..readmostly) \
> *(.data..percpu..page_aligned) \
> *(.data..percpu) \
> *(.data..percpu..shared_aligned) \
So percpu..page_aligned is not any more aligned to a PAGE ? or we have a
big hole before it ? Hmm....
Maybe you should put first data..percpu..page_aligned, then align to one
cache line (L1_CACHE_BYTES), then data..percpu..readmostly, so that hole
is small.
We should take care of not introducing too much holes in percpu zone.
Maybe using a new subzone ".data..percpu..small_objects" to put small
objects in it.
nm -v vmlinux | grep -10 sockets_in_use # select one random part
0000000000011e0c d cpu_min_freq
0000000000011e10 d cpu_cur_freq
0000000000011e14 d cpu_set_freq
0000000000011e18 d cpu_is_managed
0000000000011e20 d od_cpu_dbs_info
0000000000011fa0 d cs_cpu_dbs_info
00000000000120f0 d cpufreq_show_table
0000000000012100 D cpuidle_devices
0000000000012120 d ladder_devices
0000000000012200 d menu_devices
00000000000122c0 d sockets_in_use # object_size = 4 , hole = 28bytes
00000000000122e0 d prot_inuse
00000000000123e0 D nf_conntrack_untracked
0000000000012560 d rt_cache_stat
00000000000125a0 d ipv4_cookie_scratch
0000000000012740 D init_tss
0000000000014a00 D irq_stat
0000000000014a40 D cpu_info
0000000000014b00 d hv_clock
0000000000014b40 D cpu_tlbstate
0000000000014b80 d runqueues
We can see many holes because of 2^5 alignments of
individual .o .data..percpu sections.
find . -name "*.o"|xargs objdump -h|grep percpu
Linker promotes a section alignment from natural alignment to 2^5 as
soon as the size reaches 2^5
For example in net/ipv4/route.o, we have a per_cpu structure
(rt_cache_stat), that is an array of 16 integers. The natural alignement
should be 4 (alignof(int)), but we get :
# objdump -h net/ipv4/route.o|grep percpu
19 .data..percpu 00000040 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00007a80 2**5
For a section replicated N times, this really is a concern.
Thanks !
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists