linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2.6.36-rc7] infiniband: update workqueue usage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:38:06 +0200
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
CC:	Roland Dreier <rolandd@...co.com>,
	Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
	Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
	linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2.6.36-rc7] infiniband: update workqueue usage

Hello,

On 10/19/2010 08:40 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
>> [ ... ]
>> This is to prepare for deprecation of flush_scheduled_work().
>> [ ... ]
>> Index: work/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
>> [ ... ]
>> +extern struct workqueue_struct *ib_wq;
>> [ ... ]
> 
> This patch adds a declaration of a global variable to a public header
> file. That might be unavoidable, but it doesn't make me happy.

Hmm... that's one very interesting reason to be unhappy.  Can you
please elaborate why addition of a global variable doesn't make you
happy?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/