linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv4 4/4] iommu: create new api to set valid da range

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:45:16 +0300 (EEST)
From:	Hiroshi DOYU <Hiroshi.DOYU@...ia.com>
To:	felipe.contreras@...il.com
Cc:	x0095840@...com, felipe.contreras@...ia.com, david.cohen@...ia.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 4/4] iommu: create new api to set valid da range

From: "ext felipe.contreras@...il.com" <felipe.contreras@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 4/4] iommu: create new api to set valid da range
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:35:50 +0200

> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Fernando Guzman Lugo <x0095840@...com> wrote:
>> Some IOMMUs cannot use the whole 0x0 - 0xFFFFFFFF range.
>> With this new API the valid range can be set.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fernando Guzman Lugo <x0095840@...com>
> 
> I don't see the point in having an API. It could be done through
> platform data, and the usage of 0xFFFFF000 instead of ULONG_MAX is
> independent of this.

Using platform data is better, but why dropping da_end?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/