linux-kernel - Re: + softirq-cleanup-preempt-check.patch added to -mm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4CBEB767.7030404@suse.cz>
Date:	Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:33:27 +0200
From:	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	mm-commits@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: + softirq-cleanup-preempt-check.patch added to -mm tree

On 10/09/2010 06:15 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> But I agree the line should be split, I however much prefer the form:
> 
> static inline
> void softirq_preempt_check(struct softirq_action *h, int prev_count)

Ok I can do that while I'm ratelimiting the message. When this error
occurs, it floods the kmsg quite a lot for works like netif_rx.

thanks,
-- 
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/