linux-kernel - Re: PROBLEM: memory corrupting bug, bisected to 6dda9d55

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1287570736.2198.19.camel@pasglop>
Date:	Wed, 20 Oct 2010 21:32:16 +1100
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	pacman@...h.dhis.org
Cc:	Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: memory corrupting bug, bisected to 6dda9d55

On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 22:23 -0500, pacman@...h.dhis.org wrote:
> The diff fragment above applied inside prom_close_stdin, but there are
> some
> prom_printf calls after prom_close_stdin. Calling prom_printf after
> closing
> stdout sounds like it could be bad. If I moved it down below all the
> prom_printf's, it would be after the "quiesce" call. Would that be
> acceptable
> (or even interesting as an experiment)? Does a close need a quiesce
> after it?

Just try :-) "quiesce" is something that afaik only apple ever
implemented anyways. It uses hooks inside their OF to shut down all
drivers that do bus master (among other HW sanitization tasks).

Cheers,
Ben.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/