linux-kernel - Re: [UnifiedV4 00/16] The Unified slab allocator (V4)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1010200846130.23134@router.home>
Date:	Wed, 20 Oct 2010 08:47:30 -0500 (CDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
cc:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [UnifiedV4 00/16] The Unified slab allocator (V4)

On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, David Rientjes wrote:

> Overall, the results are _much_ better than the vanilla slub allocator
> that I frequently saw ~20% regressions with the TCP_RR netperf benchmark
> on a couple of my machines with larger cpu counts.  However, there still
> is a significant performance degradation compared to slab.

It seems that the memory leak is still present. This likely skews the
results. Thought I had it fixed. Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/