[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19646.63514.852665.500420@quad.stoffel.home>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:09:30 -0400
From: "John Stoffel" <john@...ffel.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: John Stoffel <john@...ffel.org>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, hch@...radead.org,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ibm.com>, warthog9@...nel.org,
david@...morbit.com, jmorris@...ei.org, kyle@...artin.ca,
hpa@...or.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] IMA: move read/write counters into struct inode
>>>>> "Al" == Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk> writes:
Al> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 09:10:27AM -0400, John Stoffel wrote:
>> Does this mean I can't replace /bin/sh on a running system using IMA
>> at all, even if just one process has it opened and is running? So how
>> the hell am I supposed to do live upgrades on a system?
Al> rename(2). Prohibition against write(2) to binary being executed is
Al> *old*. Try to do the following:
Al> cp /bin/sh /tmp
Al> /tmp/sh &
Al> cat /bin/ls >/tmp/sh
Al> and you'll get
Al> sh: /tmp/sh: Text file busy
Al> That has nothing to do with IMA...
Duh, makes sense. Thanks for educating me. I still IMA is a waste of
system resources...
John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists