[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0434463FDA60A94FA978ACA44617682DEE846681B9@EUSAACMS0702.eamcs.ericsson.se>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:10:51 -0400
From: Jon Maloy <jon.maloy@...csson.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
CC: Leandro Lucarella <luca@...cax.com.ar>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
"paul.gortmaker@...driver.com" <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: RE: Linux 2.6.35/TIPC 2.0 ABI breaking changes
<...>
> >
> > Remember, permitting both is a superset of the current one
> (NBO only)
> > so it is fully backwards compatible. We break absolutly nothing by
> > permitting this.
> >
> Thats effectively reverting both our patches though, isn't it
> (not that I'm disagreeing with it, just looking for
> clarification). If we revert my patch and reintroduce the
> htohl mechanism which tracks endianess, we might as well
> revert the TIPC_SUB_SERVICE flag as well, yeah?
Absolutely. I think it was a mistake to change that value.
But I don't think we need to reintroduce the htohl(). That
was just one way of doing it. If I understood your suggestion
from yesterday correctly you converted the whole message within
one if()clause, without any htohl(). I have have no problem with
that approach.
///jon
>
> Neil
>
> >
> > >
> > > [1] http://tipc.sourceforge.net/doc/draft-spec-tipc-06.html
> > > [2]
> http://tipc.sourceforge.net/doc/draft-spec-tipc-06.html#anchor92
> > >
> > > --
> > > Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca)
> http://llucax.com.ar/
> > >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > -- GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145 104C 949E
> BFB6 5F5A
> > > 8D05)
> > >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > -- CARANCHO OBNUBILADO APARECE EN PARQUE CHACABUCO!
> > > -- Crónica TV
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> netdev" in
> > > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo
> > > info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> netdev" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More
> majordomo info
> > at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
> --
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists