[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CBF431C.3070002@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:29:32 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Trinabh Gupta <trinabh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>, lenb@...nel.org,
suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC V1] cpuidle: add idle routine registration and cleanup pm_idle
pointer
On 10/20/2010 12:28 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 12:25 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> (the pm_idle is an x86 only problem. other architectures should be able
>> to keep doing what they are doing)
> sadly no, some architectures copied this brilliant piece of design.
>
> A quick git grep suggests:
> arm/blackfin/cris/ia64/m32r/m68knommu/microblaze/mn10300/sh/sparc all
> have pm_idle.
any of those that only every use one are the easy case.
the ones that use multiple can convert to the same solution x86 has over
time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists