[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CBF4D78.1050404@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:13:44 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com" <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
"linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/mm] x86, mm: Fix incorrect data type in vmalloc_sync_all()
On 10/20/2010 01:10 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
> Date: Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:53:43PM -0700
>
>> (This is a constant problem, by the way: people seems to want to prefix,
>> not suffix, their commentary; "cover letter" style.) I suspect git
>> needs to change, but it's hard to know exactly how to change it.
>
> That's easy, remove the cover letter style when inlining patches further
> down the mail.
The problem is that right now, if there is text like this:
A
---
B
patch
A is retained, and B discarded. When to discard A and when to discard B
is the hard part.
> But yeah, I'm still trying to decide for me which mail attribution
> format (set attribution="..." in mutt) is better/clearer:
>
> From: foo
> Date: bar
>
> or
>
> On <date>, <person> said:
>
> Hmm...
>
Well, the latter can at least be edited out.
The former *really* gunks up git.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists