[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1287605385.27545.9.camel@wall-e.seibold.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:09:45 +0200
From: Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kfifo must_check warning (+ patch)
The problem should be fixed. I renamed the __kfifo_must_check_helper()
into __kfifo_uint_must_check_helper() and add a new
__kfifo_int_must_check_helper() which is now used for kfifo_alloc().
A kernel linux 2.6.36-rc compiled with gcc 4.4.4 doesn't show the
warning.
There a only two functions which return a int: kfifo_alloc() and
kfifo_init(). The later one does not make use of
__kfifo_int_must_check_helper(), but this could be change if required.
I will send the patch in a separate mail.
Am Mittwoch, den 20.10.2010, 11:56 -0700 schrieb Andrew Morton:
> On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 19:37:02 +0100
> Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > > Some versions of gcc mysteriously report:
> > > drivers/char/n_gsm.c:1580: warning: ignoring return value of '__kfifo_must_check_helper', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
> > >
> > > This warning can be eliminated by using a local variable for the
> > > returned result value, as suggested by Andrew Morton.
> >
> > But that just hides the bug in the helper surely - the helper has type
> > errors so needs fixing - not this. If you apply this then the underlying
> > bug is just going to get forgotten
> >
>
> It won't get forgotten.
>
> I agree that the warning is probably an artifact of the signedness
> thing. So for 2.6.36, disabling __kfifo_must_check_helper() will
> suffice. I'm sure that Stefani will fix up __kfifo_must_check_helper()
> for real for 2.6.37, then we can see if the warning reoccurs.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists