[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CBFD92B.5090503@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 23:09:47 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"hpa@...ux.intel.com" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/mm] percpu: Introduce a read-mostly percpu API
On 10/20/2010 11:07 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le mercredi 20 octobre 2010 à 22:54 -0700, H. Peter Anvin a écrit :
>
>> L1_CACHE_BYTES is completely pointless, since if there is sharing to
>> worry about *at all*, it's probably at the L2 or L3 cache levels.
>>
>
> I see, and we dont have better way to express this hint/requirement than
> using PAGE_SIZE or INTERNODE_CACHE_SHIFT ?
>
> In your patch you force a PAGE_SIZE alignement *before*
> *(.data..percpu..page_aligned)
>
> If this alignment is really needed, this should be part of another
> patch, since this fixes a previous bug in 2.6.36 ?
>
It was part of Shaohua's patch... I don't know if it does anything
useful, but it also doesn't hurt.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists