linux-kernel - Finishing off cpumask...

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201010211735.23918.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date:	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:35:23 +1030
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Mike Travis <travis@....com>, anton@...ba.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Finishing off cpumask...

I have had five final cpumask patches in my queue for over a year now, and
I'd like to merge them *next* merge window (not this one, too late).

The first two finally convert mm_struct and task_struct to variable cpumasks,
which are the last in the core kernel.  The next two turn off and break
old-style cpumask uses when CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK is set, and the final one
actually means we don't allocate all NR_CPUS bits for bitmasks.

Historically, this stuff has revealed issues when turned on, so I'd like it
to have a long baking cycle in Ingo's tree and big-machine testers.

I'm rebasing and retesting now, will post git tree when I have it.

Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/