[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1287652096.3488.63.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:08:16 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: pjt@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Pierre Bourdon <pbourdon@...ellency.fr>
Subject: Re: [RFC tg_shares_up improvements - v1 01/12] sched: rewrite
tg_shares_up
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 13:38 +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> > + se->on_rq = 0;
>
> Since setting and un-setting of se->on_rq is completely handled within
> sched_fair.c, we can remove the redundant setting and un-setting of
> se->on_rq from sched.c:[en]dequeue_task. Even w/o this patch, they were
> redundant I suppose.
sadly not, sched_rt.c also uses them. It really shouldn't live in
sched_entity but in a common set.
I've long wanted to rework all that into something like:
struct sched_entity {
/* common fields */
union {
struct sched_fair_entity fair;
struct sched_rt_entity rt;
};
};
But that never quite happened.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists