[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101021121409.6de7d429@absol.kitzblitz>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:14:09 +0200
From: Nicolas Kaiser <nikai@...ai.net>
To: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>
Cc: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com>, linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] sctp: remove redundant chunk length check
Checking the chunk length at this point appears redundant, as
the rest of the packet gets discarded anyway.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Kaiser <nikai@...ai.net>
---
net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c | 6 ------
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
index 4b4eb7c..9840615 100644
--- a/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
+++ b/net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c
@@ -3418,12 +3418,6 @@ static sctp_disposition_t sctp_sf_shut_8_4_5(const struct sctp_endpoint *ep,
SCTP_INC_STATS(SCTP_MIB_OUTCTRLCHUNKS);
- /* If the chunk length is invalid, we don't want to process
- * the reset of the packet.
- */
- if (!sctp_chunk_length_valid(chunk, sizeof(sctp_chunkhdr_t)))
- return sctp_sf_pdiscard(ep, asoc, type, arg, commands);
-
/* We need to discard the rest of the packet to prevent
* potential bomming attacks from additional bundled chunks.
* This is documented in SCTP Threats ID.
--
1.7.2.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists