linux-kernel - Re: ?Powermanagement?-Regression in 2.6.36

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101021152417.GA16661@citd.de>
Date:	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:24:17 +0200
From:	Matthias Schniedermeyer <ms@...d.de>
To:	Christian Bahls <lkml@...52.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ?Powermanagement?-Regression in 2.6.36

On 21.10.2010 16:34, Christian Bahls wrote:
> Dear List
> 
> PPS: bisecting this regression seems to be out of question
>  recompiling the kernel on this computer takes a few hours
>  as all the other computers i use are 64bit
>  i would alternatively have to setup a cross-compilation environment
>  which i have not done in years (and not without rocklinux either)

As far as it is my experience, x86 32bit/64bit can build each other.

On the "big" machine just add "ARCH=x86" to (all!) make invocations.
ARCH=x86 makes "CONFIG_64BIT" an actual configuration option and 
honours whatever is configured in the .config-file.





Bis denn

-- 
Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as 
bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer
wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated, 
cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/