[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikKFnVOFr70u_2Hdtz0mXuAEckWWUy885m_ut--@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:21:15 -0400
From: Andev <debiandev@...il.com>
To: linux kernel <kernelnewbies@...linux.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Disable L1/L2/L3 cache and MTRR
Hello,
You need to set the 30th bit of CR0 register to disable the cache.
I've tried disabling the L1/L2/L3 cache in an intel processor as follows.
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL");
static int hello_init(void)
{
printk(KERN_ALERT "Hello, world\n");
__asm__("push %rax\n\t"
"mov %cr0,%rax;\n\t"
"or $(1 << 30),%rax;\n\t"
"mov %rax,%cr0;\n\t"
"wbinvd\n\t"
"pop %rax"
);
return 0;
}
static void hello_exit(void)
{
printk(KERN_ALERT "Goodbye, cruel world\n");
__asm__("push %rax\n\t"
"mov %cr0,%rax;\n\t"
"and $~(1 << 30),%rax;\n\t"
"mov %rax,%cr0;\n\t"
"pop %rax"
);
}
module_init(hello_init);
module_exit(hello_exit);
When I try to remove this module, the system hangs! Any help?
In Intel software developers manual, it is mentioned that apart from the
above you need to disable MTRR. I did that using the following command:
echo "disable=00" >| /proc/mtrr
Now when I run some sample benchmarks they show a slowdown of almost 1000x!!
This is not reasonable since the max. The slowdown I was expecting is 200x
considering that it will take 200 cycles to read from DRAM.
Thanks,
Andev.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists