linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 20/22] bitops: remove ext2 non-atomic bitops from asm/bitops.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <AECEA79F-28E8-49B0-8C13-2CF115A6ECB4@dilger.ca>
Date:	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:52:15 -0600
From:	Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
To:	Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 20/22] bitops: remove ext2 non-atomic bitops from asm/bitops.h

On 2010-10-21, at 08:41, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> As the result of conversions, there are no users of ext2 non-atomic bit
> operations except for ext2 file system itself.  Now we can put them
> into architecture independent code in ext2 file system, and remove
> from asm/bitops.h for all architectures.

Presumably there will be a separate patch series to remove the atomic ext2 bitops?  I was going to suggest removing the ext2 comment in bitops.h, but I notice that there are still the atomic bitops left.

In any case, thanks for your efforts.  I agree that these ext2_* functions have no place in the generic code, and are only there for historical reasons.

> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h
> @@ -327,22 +327,10 @@ static inline int fls(int x)
> * Ext2 is defined to use little-endian byte ordering.
> * These do not need to be atomic.
> */
> -#define ext2_set_bit(nr,p)			\
> -		__test_and_set_le_bit(nr, (unsigned long *)(p))
> #define ext2_set_bit_atomic(lock,nr,p)          \
> 		test_and_set_le_bit(nr, (unsigned long *)(p))
> -#define ext2_clear_bit(nr,p)			\
> -		__test_and_clear_le_bit(nr, (unsigned long *)(p))
> #define ext2_clear_bit_atomic(lock,nr,p)        \
> 		test_and_clear_le_bit(nr, (unsigned long *)(p))
> -#define ext2_test_bit(nr,p)			\
> -		test_le_bit(nr, (unsigned long *)(p))
> -#define ext2_find_first_zero_bit(p,sz)		\
> -		find_first_zero_le_bit((unsigned long *)(p), sz)
> -#define ext2_find_next_zero_bit(p,sz,off)	\
> -		find_next_zero_le_bit((unsigned long *)(p), sz, off)
> -#define ext2_find_next_bit(p, sz, off) \
> -		find_next_le_bit((unsigned long *)(p), sz, off)


Cheers, Andreas





--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/