[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <x497hhbe117.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:36:20 -0400
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>,
linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfq-iosched: Fix a gcc 4.5 warning and put some comments
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> writes:
> - Andi encountedred following warning with gcc 4.5
>
> linux/block/cfq-iosched.c: In function ‘cfq_dispatch_requests’:
> linux/block/cfq-iosched.c:2156:3: warning: array subscript is above array
> bounds
>
> - Warning happens due to following code.
>
> slice = group_slice * count /
> max_t(unsigned, cfqg->busy_queues_avg[cfqd->serving_prio],
> cfq_group_busy_queues_wl(cfqd->serving_prio, cfqd, cfqg));
>
> gcc is complaining about cfqg->busy_queues_avg[] being indexed by CFQ
> prio classes (RT, BE and IDLE) while the array size is only 2.
>
> - At run time, we never access cfqg->busy_queues_avg[IDLE] and return from
> function before this code hits.
>
> - To fix warning increase the array size though it will remain unused. This
> patch also puts some comments to clarify some of the confusions.
>
> - I have taken Jens's patch and modified it a bit.
>
> - Compile tested with gcc 4.4 and boot tested. I don't have gcc 4.5
> running, Andi can you please test it with gcc 4.5 to make sure it
> worked.
>
> Reported-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Acked-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists