[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101021150250.f6499506.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:02:50 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
Cc: Luca Barbieri <luca@...a-barbieri.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/atomic64_test: do not build on non-atomic64 systems
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 13:27:15 -0400
Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org> wrote:
> If the arch doesn't provide atomic64 functionality (there are quite a
> few), then don't bother trying to build this test.
>
I don't get it. If the arch doesn't implement atomic64 then this file
will get zillions of build errors, won't it?
> diff --git a/lib/atomic64_test.c b/lib/atomic64_test.c
> index 250ed11..0ac1a66 100644
> --- a/lib/atomic64_test.c
> +++ b/lib/atomic64_test.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <asm/atomic.h>
>
> +#ifdef ATOMIC64_INIT
hm, that's a bit lazy. It should really use a CONFIG_HAVE_ thing. What
a pita.
> #define INIT(c) do { atomic64_set(&v, c); r = c; } while (0)
> static __init int test_atomic64(void)
> {
> @@ -164,3 +166,5 @@ static __init int test_atomic64(void)
> }
>
> core_initcall(test_atomic64);
> +
> +#endif
> --
> 1.7.3.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists